Challenge: Despite ongoing government reforms, corruption and inefficient spending remains pervasive in Kazakhstan’s public procurement. The government has promoted public participation in procurement monitoring, which is vital to combating corruption and improving efficiency, but few independent civil society organizations and individuals had the information, skills and influence to track contracting effectively.
Open contracting approach: The government’s adoption of an open e-procurement system has empowered civil society to monitor public contracts for corruption, promote public debate about government spending, and improve the delivery of government projects and services. Data scientists, journalists, researchers and former civil servants with an interest in public procurement are systematically monitoring contracting procedures for corruption risks and irregularities
, using analytics tools that source data from the government’s e-procurement system
via a public API. While the e-procurement system doesn’t include the quasi-governmental sector and sovereign wealth fund (which aren’t governed by the public procurement law) it provides full transparency on the general procurement market which accounts for at least a third of Kazakhstan’s public spending. The analytics tools use
international and local indicators to
calculate performance metrics and
risks, allowing monitors to develop a body of evidence around the most common schemes and violations, and investigate tip-offs or red flags about individual cases. The monitors keep up the pressure after alerting authorities to problems to ensure violations are appropriately sanctioned. Different civic monitors have different approaches, but they run coordinated campaigns to advocate for systemic reforms. They share educational resources with the general public and each other.
Results: A formal monitoring coalition of 15 Kazakh civil society organizations has been established, with the aim of increasing transparency, promoting fair competition and efficient spending, and improving public trust. While there is no simple way of measuring the impact of all civic monitoring activities, some impressive achievements have been documented. Since 2021, cases of corruption and other irregularities detected by the group Adildik Joly have led to fines worth KZT 244 million (~US$511,000), as well as 66 criminal cases, and 1100 administrative protocols (formal warnings to civil servants). In the Kun Jarygy coalition’s first year, they detected 270 purchases with violations, resulting in five criminal cases and KZT 11.38 million (~US$24,000) being returned to the budget. And the media outlet ProTenge has stopped suspicious purchases worth at least US$3 million. Advocacy campaigns have contributed to important changes to procurement laws and practices, for example, encouraging compliance with competition rules, allowing civil society to file complaints about procurement for the first time, and increasing disclosure of quasi-governmental sector procurement data. Finally, the Anti-Corruption Agency is
proactively supporting the development of civic monitoring and has agreed to cooperate with the civil society coalition to monitor procurement.